-
Voting:
-
0
+
You have seen more norms than you want to.
— Frank Luk
·
Nov. 19, 1979
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
0
+
This is a very vague argument, but it's valid in practice.
— Frank Luk
·
Feb. 16, 1979
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
0
+
Usually, of course, you stop after a finite number of steps.
— Frank Luk
·
Jan. 24, 1979
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
0
+
If we do not know f(x), its (n+1)st derivative is even harder to come by.
— Frank Luk
·
Nov. 8, 1978
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
1
+
So zero is strictly less than one.
— Frank Luk
·
Oct. 11, 1978
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
0
+
It seems we have transformed a difficult problem into an impossible one.
— Frank Luk
·
Oct. 9, 1978
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
1
+
I won't give you a sketch of the proof because the sketch wouldn't be sketchy.
— Frank Luk
·
Oct. 6, 1978
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
1
+
The proof of this is so simple that I'm going to give it.
— Frank Luk
·
Oct. 6, 1978
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
0
+
The accuracy should not be doubted, because numerical analysis sends people to the moon.
— Frank Luk
·
Oct. 2, 1978
·
Permalink
-
Voting:
-
0
+
Of course we do not wait until i goes to infinity.
— Frank Luk
·
Sept. 4, 1978
·
Permalink